4.5 Article

Experimental investigation of subsonic and transonic flows through a linear turbine cascade

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS
卷 103, 期 -, 页码 182-192

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2023.10.002

关键词

Transonic flow; Shock wave-boundary layer interaction; Trailing edge wake; VKI LS-59 cascade

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the characteristics of high subsonic and transonic flows through a linear cascade using experimental investigations and numerical simulations. The experiments measured static pressure, flow field, and turbulent intensity, and provided inlet conditions for the numerical simulations. The simulations validated the experimental data and tested the applicability of the turbulence models.
Experimental investigations of high subsonic and transonic flows through a linear cascade consists of VKI LS-59 blades have been carried out. Emphasis was put on analysis of the flow characteristics at the cascade exit. Experiments reported the static pressure measurements on blade surface, flow field survey downstream the cascade by means of Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and visualization by means of the Schlieren method. The turbulent intensity measurements have been performed at the cascade inlet to provide inlet conditions for numerical studies. The measurements have been carried out at two isentropic Mach numbers: M-2,M-is = 0.777 (high subsonic) and M-2,M-is = 0.975 (transonic). The corresponding Reynolds numbers based on the chord length and isentropic downstream velocity were equal to Re-2,Re-is = 6.21 center dot 10(5) and Re-2,Re-is = 6.82 center dot 10(5), respectively. The numerical simulations with Transition SST model have been performed to complement experiments and to verify applicability of data for testing and development of turbulence models. The RANS-based transition model reproduced correct isentropic Mach number profiles on the blade surface but underpredicted the turbulent mixing in the wake flow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据