4.7 Article

Charge regulation by ferromagnetic metal/LiF spin-polarized interface for high-performance Li metal anodes

期刊

RARE METALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NONFERROUS METALS SOC CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s12598-023-02517-4

关键词

Lithium metal anode; Interfacial charge; Ferromagnetic metal; Lithium fluoride; Spin polarization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interfacial characteristics of the Li metal anode are crucial for its overall performance. Researchers have found that modifying the carbon cloth framework using ferromagnetic metal/LiF heterogeneous films can greatly enhance the electrochemical performance. The improved performance is attributed to the spin-polarized interface contributed by the Co/LiF heterostructure.
The interfacial characteristics of the Li metal anode (LMA) play a crucial role in its overall performance. Despite various materials being applied to modify the interface, a comprehensive understanding of their specific mechanisms remains to be investigated. Herein, we have prepared carbon cloth (CC) frameworks with their surfaces modified using ferromagnetic metal/LiF heterogeneous films (TM -LiF-CC) as the substrate for LMA, which exhibit superior electrochemical performance. Utilizing ferro-magnetic Co as a representative example, our study demonstrates that the enhanced performance of Co-LiF-CC, compared to bare CC, is attributed to the spin-polarized interface contributed by the Co/LiF heterostructure. Co and LiF play individual roles in redistributing electrons and Li+ to promote homogeneous Li deposition. Co nanoparticles play a crucial role in generating strong surface capacitance by storing electrons in spin-split bands, while LiF, with low surface diffusion barriers, ensures fast transportation of Li+. The Co-LiF-CC@Li electrodes deliver long lives of 7400 and 3600 h at 1 and 2 mA center dot cm(-2) in symmetric cells, respectively; moreover, they enable full batteries with high and durable capacities, particularly when the N/P ratios are low (3.3 or even 1.7).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据