4.0 Article

On Knowing Nature's Syntax: Preliminary Cisness, Victorian Physiology and George Eliot

期刊

GENDER AND HISTORY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0424.12757

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the theorisation of natural laws in mid-nineteenth century British physiology and argues that it creates a 'preliminary cisness' in Victorian sexual science. By examining George Eliot's Adam Bede alongside works by Herbert Spencer and George Henry Lewes, the article suggests that Eliot presents social sympathy as an alternative to the ethical risks of pre-cis sex.
As a trans intervention in Victorian studies and historical extension of recent work in trans studies, this article argues that the theorisation of natural laws in mid-nineteenth century, British physiology produces a 'preliminary cisness' in Victorian sexual science. By then juxtaposing George Eliot's Adam Bede with work by Herbert Spencer and George Henry Lewes and undertaking a close study of the characters Hetty Sorrel and Dinah Morris, this article suggests that Eliot offers social sympathy as a non-cis, epistemological alternative to the ethical risks of pre-cis sex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据