4.8 Article

Robust and Fast-Ion Conducting Interphase Empowering SiOx Anode Toward High Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202302899

关键词

fast-ion conducting interphase; high mechanical strength; lithium-ion battery; silicon suboxides; solid-electrolyte interphase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By pre-constructing an artificial SEI layer, the modified SiOx anode exhibits higher ICE, better capacity retention and superior rate capability, improving the applicability and performance of SiOx-based anodes.
Silicon suboxides (SiOx) materials are highly desirable as anode for high energy Li-ion batteries due to their much higher specific capacity than conventional graphite anode. However, the low initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE) and inadequate capacity retention of SiOx anode arising from its immense volume variation during repeated lithiation/delithiation process greatly hinder its practical applications. To address these drawbacks of SiOx, by a simple calcination method, a robust and fast-ion conducting interphase enriched of LiF, Li2C2O4, LiBO2, and Li2B4O7 is rationally pre-constructed With the assistance of this pre-constructed artificial protective layer, the formed solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer possesses high Young's modulus and fast Li+ conducting, and thus can accommodate the plastic deformation of SiOx anode, alleviate the parasitic reactions, and maintain the electrode integrity upon cycling. Thus, the modified SiOx (M-SiOx) anode exhibits higher ICE, better capacity retention and superior rate capability. More encouragingly, full cells pairing the M-SiOx anode with LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 cathode show a high capacity retention of 80.6% for 200 cycles. This paper reveals the importance of pre-constructing an artificial SEI layer and regulating interfacial chemistry in improving the performance of SiOx-based anodes, which is a milestone work for boosting the large scale application of SiOx-based anodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据