4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Reusable Polystyrene-Functionalized Basic Ionic Liquids as Catalysts for Carboxylation of Amines to Disubstituted Ureas

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 451-460

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01369

关键词

Amines; Disubstituted urea; CO2; Carboxylation; Polystyrene; Ionic liquids

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning as Fusion Research Program for Green Technologies [2012M3C1A1054497]
  2. C1 Gas Refinery Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea [2015M3D3A1A01064895]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015M3D3A1A01064895] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of polystyrene (PS)-functionalized basic ionic liquids (BILs) were prepared and used as catalysts for synthesis of disubstituted ureas (DSUs) from amines and carbon dioxide (CO2). The PS-BILs as prepared were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. For investigating the catalytic activities, all PS-BILs were tested in a model reaction of cyclohexylamine (CHA) and CO2 to synthesize dicyclohexylurea (DCU). Poly-2 having branched [bis-imidazolium]/[bis-bicarbonate] was found to show the highest activity for the DCU formation among all PS-BILs catalysts. For a comparison point of view, ceria (CeO2) as a typical catalyst and original Merrifield's resin (MR) was also applied for the reaction. Reaction conditions were optimized by varying reaction temperature, pressure, reaction time, and amount of catalyst used. Under optimized conditions, reactions of various amines with CO2 to synthesize the corresponding diureas were carried out in the presence of the most active catalyst (poly-2). Furthermore, poly-2 could be easily recovered and reused up to seven consecutive cycles with no significant loss of the catalytic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据