4.2 Article

Bias reduction for semi-competing risks frailty model with rare events: application to a chronic kidney disease cohort study in South Korea

期刊

LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10985-023-09612-9

关键词

Semi-competing risks; Penalized likelihood; Rare event; Firth's correction; Cohort study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a new method for handling semi-competing risk data. By incorporating penalized likelihood estimation and the gamma frailty model, the proposed method reduces bias caused by rare events in datasets with a small number of events.
In a semi-competing risks model in which a terminal event censors a non-terminal event but not vice versa, the conventional method can predict clinical outcomes by maximizing likelihood estimation. However, this method can produce unreliable or biased estimators when the number of events in the datasets is small. Specifically, parameter estimates may converge to infinity, or their standard errors can be very large. Moreover, terminal and non-terminal event times may be correlated, which can account for the frailty term. Here, we adapt the penalized likelihood with Firth's correction method for gamma frailty models with semi-competing risks data to reduce the bias caused by rare events. The proposed method is evaluated in terms of relative bias, mean squared error, standard error, and standard deviation compared to the conventional methods through simulation studies. The results of the proposed method are stable and robust even when data contain only a few events with the misspecification of the baseline hazard function. We also illustrate a real example with a multi-centre, patient-based cohort study to identify risk factors for chronic kidney disease progression or adverse clinical outcomes. This study will provide a better understanding of semi-competing risk data in which the number of specific diseases or events of interest is rare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据