4.7 Article

Evolutionary algorithm-based integrated design of material-structural microwave absorption using material extrusion

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107891

关键词

A. Multifunctional composites; B. Electrical properties; B. Mechanical properties; E. 3-D Printing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of electromagnetic wave absorbing materials and structures is of great importance in fields like aerospace and electronic communications. Traditional absorbing coatings have poor mechanical load-bearing capacity and struggle to meet lightweight requirements. In this study, a functional absorbing composite filament was developed using material extrusion technique, along with a magnetic lossy four-layer gradient honeycomb metastructure. The design enables effective absorption in the range of 6.09-37.18 GHz within a thickness of 16 mm, covering 81.82% of the frequency range of 2-40 GHz.
The development of electromagnetic wave absorbing materials and structures holds significant importance in fields such as aerospace and electronic communications. Traditional absorbing coatings have poor mechanical load-bearing capacity and struggle to meet the requirements of lightweight applications. On the other hand, the research on lossy dielectric absorbers is limited by process constraints, making it difficult to fabricate complex configurations, thereby greatly restricting their broadband absorption performance. In this study, a functional absorbing composite filament was developed using material extrusion technique. A magnetic lossy four-layer gradient honeycomb metastructure was designed, which enables effective absorption in the frequency range of 6.09-37.18 GHz within a thickness of 16 mm. The effective absorption bandwidth covers 81.82 % in the frequency range of 2-40 GHz. This broadband absorbing design achieves the integration of material functionality and structural design by additive manufacturing, enabling effective absorption across a broad frequency range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据