4.4 Article

Classification of events from a-induced reactions in the MUSIC detector via statistical and ML methods

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2023.168786

关键词

AI/ML methods; a-induced reactions; Active target; Experimental nuclear physics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a method for automatically classifying events from specific a-induced reactions by combining statistical and machine learning methods. Compared to traditional techniques, this method requires less input from domain scientists and produces similar results in two experimental data sets.
The Multi-Sampling Ionization Chamber (MUSIC) detector is typically used to measure nuclear reaction cross sections relevant for nuclear astrophysics, fusion studies, and other applications. From the MUSIC data produced in one experiment scientists carefully extract an order of 103 events of interest from about 109 total events, where each event can be represented by an 18-dimensional vector. However, the standard data classification process is based on expert-driven, manually intensive data analysis techniques that require several months to identify patterns and classify the relevant events from the collected data. To address this issue, we present a method for the classification of events originating from specific a-induced reactions by combining statistical and machine learning methods that require significantly less input from the domain scientist, relative to the standard technique. We applied the new method to two experimental data sets and compared our results with those obtained using traditional methods. With few exceptions, the new method yields results such that the percent change with respect to results obtained with traditional methods are within +/- 20%. With the present method, which is the first of its kind for the MUSIC data, we have established the foundation for the automated extraction of physical events of interest from experiments using the MUSIC detector.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据