4.7 Article

Mind wandering in anxiety disorders: A status report

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105432

关键词

Mind wandering; Anxiety; Rumination; Worry; Experience sampling; Sustained attention; Self-report scales; Meta-awareness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study briefly describes and discusses the role of mind wandering (MW) in anxiety disorders. It suggests that overall MW is positively correlated with anxiety symptoms, and characteristics of worry and rumination may be relevant in anxiety. Furthermore, comorbid depressive and ADHD symptoms may contribute to excessive MW in anxiety. MW-related therapeutic interventions may be useful as complementary treatments in anxiety disorders, but further studies are needed to confirm and expand these initial findings.
Many investigations have targeted the subject of worry in anxiety disorders. Worry can be regarded as a subtype of mind wandering (MW), which is undeliberate, perseverative, negatively-valenced, and mainly future-oriented. Nevertheless, until now only a few studies have explored the role of overall MW in the origin and course of anxiety disorders. To foster progress in this field, we briefly describe and discuss relevant studies addressing MW in subjects with anxiety disorders or symptoms or disorders associated with anxiety symptoms. Provisional synthesis suggests that: a) the overall amount of MW is positively correlated with anxiety symptoms; b) MW characteristics reflecting worry and rumination appear to be relevant in anxiety; c) comorbid depressive and ADHD symptoms may contribute to excessive MW in anxiety; d) MW-related therapeutic interventions may be useful as complementary treatments in anxiety disorders. However, more studies related to MW in anxiety disorders or symptoms are necessary to corroborate and extend these initial findings. Such investigations should ideally combine experience sampling with self-rating assessments of both MW and worry/rumination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据