4.7 Review

Uncovering the Holocene roots of contemporary disease-scapes: bringing archaeology into One Health

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0525

关键词

niche construction theory; zoonotic diseases; disease ecology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines the impact of humans as niche constructors on the emergence of new host species and disease scapes from the Late Pleistocene to the Anthropocene. It highlights the untapped potential of archaeological records in understanding the dynamics of zoonotic diseases and proposes the integration of biomolecular tools and omics advancements with archaeological and paleoecological reconstructions.
The accelerating pace of emerging zoonotic diseases in the twenty-first century has motivated cross-disciplinary collaboration on One Health approaches, combining microbiology, veterinary and environmental sciences, and epidemiology for outbreak prevention and mitigation. Such outbreaks are often caused by spillovers attributed to human activities that encroach on wildlife habitats and ecosystems, such as land use change, industrialized food production, urbanization and animal trade. While the origin of anthropogenic effects on animal ecology and biogeography can be traced to the Late Pleistocene, the archaeological record-a long-term archive of human-animal-environmental interactions-has largely been untapped in these One Health approaches, thus limiting our understanding of these dynamics over time. In this review, we examine how humans, as niche constructors, have facilitated new host species and 'disease-scapes' from the Late Pleistocene to the Anthropocene, by viewing zooarchaeological, bioarchaeological and palaeoecological data with a One Health perspective. We also highlight how new biomolecular tools and advances in the '-omics' can be holistically coupled with archaeological and palaeoecological reconstructions in the service of studying zoonotic disease emergence and re-emergence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据