4.7 Article

Quantifying uncertainty in soil moisture retrieval using a Bayesian neural network framework

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108414

关键词

Soil moisture; Bayesian neural network (BNN); Uncertainty

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a new Bayesian neural network framework that quantifies the uncertainty in retrieving soil moisture (SM) and ultimately reduces the uncertainty and improves accuracy using techniques such as Monte-Carlo dropout and Deep Ensembles.
Soil moisture (SM) is an important parameter for precision agriculture and water cycle. Recent studies of using Global Navigation Satellite System-Reflectometry (GNSS-R) to retrieve SM have shown that the joint use of data and models is an effective method. However, data and models are often accompanied by two types of uncertainties (i.e., data uncertainty and model uncertainty), which can lead to retrieved results with high uncertainty resulting in false reliability. In this study, we propose a new Bayesian neural network (BNN) framework composed of two techniques: Monte-Carlo (MC)-dropout and Deep Ensembles. It quantifies the uncertainty and feeds it back to the framework to ultimately reduce the uncertainty in the retrieved results and improve accuracy. To verify the proposed framework, we conduct experiments using in situ data sets and Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) data sets respectively. The results show that MC-dropout can improve the correlation coefficient (R) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) by 8%-21% and 7%-20%, compared to basic multilayer perceptron (MLP). Deep Ensembles can improve the R and RMSE by 9%-36% and 11%-25%. Concerning uncertainty, MC-dropout and Deep Ensembles can decrease the uncertainty by 37%-60% and 82% -84% relative to maximum a posteriori (MAP), respectively. This study demonstrates that BNN framework can be used to quantify the uncertainty in retrieving SM and reduce the uncertainty as well as improve the accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据