4.7 Article

Numerical simulation of steel-copper-steel composite cooling staves: Heat transfer characteristics and structural optimization

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2023.108747

关键词

Blast furnace; Cooling stave; Longevity; Structure optimization; Numerical simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The heat transmission properties of different cooling stave structures were examined and compared under various furnace conditions. The presence of a steel layer increases the maximum temperature of the cooling stave, but it remains within the allowable working temperature range. The temperature of the cooling stave is influenced by factors such as gas temperature, inlet water temperature, inlet water velocity, and slag thickness.
The heat transmission properties of the cooling stave were examined using a numerical simulation approach and compared with copper cooling stave and copper steel composite cooling stave under different furnace conditions and different structures. It is found that the existence of the steel layer greatly raises the maximum temperature of the cooling stave when no slag is present, and its hot surface temperature is 152 degrees C greater than that of the copper cooling stave. However, under typical operating conditions, the hot surface temperature of the steel layer is still below its limit working temperature of 470 degrees C. The temperature of the cooling stave rises with the temperature of the gas and the temperature of the inlet water and reduces with increasing water inlet velocity and slag thickness. To efficiently lower the temperature of the hot surface steel layer, the operation should ensure that the hot surface gas temperature is kept within 1300 degrees C, the cooling water speed is raised to 2.4 m/s, and the slag thickness should be set to 15 mm or higher. The optimal construction for a steel-copper-steel composite cooling stave is to keep the thickness of the steel layer at 11.9 mm and the thermal conductivity around 40 W/ (m & sdot;K).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据