4.8 Article

Evidence for Adverse Effects on Liver Development and Regeneration in Zebrafish by Decabromodiphenyl Ethane

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 57, 期 48, 页码 19419-19429

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c06747

关键词

decabromodiphenyl ethane; hepatotoxicity; liverdevelopment; liver regeneration; partial hepatectomy; transgenic zebrafish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the adverse effects of DBDPE on liver development and regeneration in zebrafish. The underlying mechanisms involving disturbed signaling pathways and cell cycle arrest were identified. These findings have implications for ecological and health risk assessment.
Decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE), a ubiquitous emerging pollutant, could be enriched in the liver of organisms, but its effects and mechanisms on liver development and regeneration remain largely unknown. In the present study, we first investigated the adverse effects on liver development and found decreased area and intensity of fluorescence in transgenic zebrafish larvae exposed to DBDPE; further results in wild-type zebrafish larvae revealed a possible mechanism involving disturbed MAPK/Fox O signaling pathways and cell cycle arrest as indicated by decreased transcription of growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible beta a (gadd45ba). Subsequently, an obstructed recovery process of liver tissue after partial hepatectomy was characterized by the changing profiles of ventral lobe-to-intestine ratio in transgenic female adults upon DBDPE exposure; further results confirmed the adverse effects on liver regeneration by the alterations of the hepatic somatic index and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression in wild-type female adults and also pointed out a potential role of a disturbed signaling pathway involving cell cycles and glycerolipid metabolism. Our results not only provided novel evidence for the hepatotoxicity and underlying mechanism of DBDPE but also were indicative of subsequent ecological and health risk assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据