4.5 Article

Improved magnetic properties of Fe substituted La2CoMnO6 for spintronic applications

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171347

关键词

Exchange bias; Magnetic moment; Anti-site disorder; Magnetic susceptibility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A detailed study of the magnetic behavior of double perovskites was conducted by developing La2Co1-xFexMnO6 using the sol-gel technique. The results showed that substituting Fe on the Co-site led to a systematic decrease in saturation magnetization but improved the magnetic properties at lower substitution levels.
A detailed study of magnetic behaviour of double perovskites was carried out by developing La2Co1-xFexMnO6; (x = 0.0, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8 and 1.0) via sol-gel technique. All samples showed single magnetic transition except pure LCMO (x = 0.0) and LCFMO2 (x = 0.5). Temperature dependent inverse magnetic susceptibility (chi-1) was fitted in accordance with Curie-Weiss law. mu eff (effective magnetic moment) was determined for all the developed samples. Pure LCMO showed a downward divergence from Curie-Weiss law below 230 K but above transition temperature which indicates the characteristics of Griffiths phase. Saturation magnetization (Ms) increased initially and then decreased, whereas coercive field (Hc) was found to be monotonous decreased with increase in Fe content. LCFMO1 (x = 0.2) was noticed to have maximum Ms (38.87 emu/g) which indicated that the magnetic properties of pure LCMO were improved with Fe substitution, but for lower substitution only. Magnetization vs. field (M -H) curves were not well saturated even at a magnetic field of 60 kOe, therefore, values of Ms for all the samples were estimated using law of approach to saturation. With increase in Fe content, an increased anti-site disorder among Mn and Co strengthened antiferromagnetic (AFM) super exchange in-teractions and weakened ferromagnetism (FM). Therefore, substitution of Fe on Co-site was responsible for systematic decrease in saturation magnetization when x exceeded 0.2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据