4.1 Article

Nurses and midwives perceptions of missed nursing care - A South Australian study

期刊

COLLEGIAN
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 413-420

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2014.09.001

关键词

Nursing and midwifery; Missed care; Rationed care; Staffing; Skill mix

类别

资金

  1. Flinders University Faculty of Health Sciences, Seeding Grant
  2. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Budgetary restrictions and shorter hospital admission times have increased demands upon nursing time leading to nurses missing or rationing care. Previous research studies involving perceptions of missed care have predominantly occurred outside of Australia. This paper reports findings from the first South Australian study to explore missed nursing care. Aim: To determine and explore nurses' perceptions of reasons for missed care within the South Australian context and across a variety of healthcare settings. Method: The survey was a collaborative venture between the Flinders University of South Australia, After Hours Nurse Staffing Work Intensity and Quality of Care project team and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, SA Branch. Electronic invitations using Survey Monkey were sent to randomly selected nurses and midwives and available online for two months. Three hundred and fifty-four nurses and midwives responded. This paper reports qualitative data from answers to the open questions. Findings: Three main reasons for missed care were determined as: competing demands that reduce time for patient care; ineffective methods for determining staffing levels; and skill mix including inadequate staff numbers. These broad issues represented participants' perceptions of missed care. Conclusion: Issues around staffing levels, skill mix and the ability to predict workload play a major role in the delivery of care. This study identified the increasing work demands on nurses/midwifes. Solutions to the rationing of care need further exploration. (C) 2014 Australian College of Nursing Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据