4.4 Article

Morphology and ultrastructure of the colleterial glands in Myzinum flower wasps (Tiphiidae, Hymenoptera)

期刊

MICRON
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2023.103561

关键词

Class-1; Class-3; Ectoparasitoid; Female accessory glands; Hymenoptera

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes the secretory glands in females of two species of Myzinum and discusses their homology with other glands in the Hymenoptera order. The study finds that the three glands, instead of the commonly believed two, are present in Myzinum species. However, the limited research on the structure, function, and evolution of female accessory glands in Hymenoptera prevents conclusive statements.
The strategies used by females to ensure the survival of their offspring are one of the key elements in insect reproductive biology. Ectoparasitoid hymenopterans, such as tiphiid wasps, use their ovipositor to deliver a single egg on the host body, where the larva develops. Here we describe the colleterial glands in females of two species of Myzinum and discuss the homology with other glands among Hymenoptera. The glands appear as two large opaque round sac-like structures that are connected to the oviduct. Histological sections revealed a com-pound gland, with a single layer of class-1 epithelial cells surrounded by a layer of class-3 gland cells, which is uncommon in Hymenoptera. Ultrastructure points to active protein synthesis, consistent with the role of colle-terial glands. Despite the consensus that colleterial glands in Hymenoptera evolved with two distinct forms, the venom gland and Dufour's gland, the three glands were present in both Myzinum species. The few studies regarding the structure, function, and homology among the female accessory glands in Hymenoptera do not allow to make conclusive statements about the evolution of these glands. Therefore, the finding in Myzinum is probably the reflection of a lack of information, rather than an exception within Aculeata.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据