4.4 Article

A CFD study of the gas reaction path in growth of InN films in metal-organic chemical vapor deposition

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH
卷 626, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2023.127464

关键词

InN; Numerical simulation; Gas-phase reaction; MOCVD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study summarized and compared the kinetic parameters of gas-phase reactions during InN MOCVD growth, and analyzed the effects of different kinetic parameters on the gas reaction path. The results showed that the change in reaction path did not significantly affect the growth rate, and pyrolytic products played a greater role in the growth rate.
During simulation of the growth of indium nitride (InN) thin films in metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD), different choices of kinetic parameters (activation energy Ea and pre-exponential factor A) for gasphase reactions give rise to many uncertainties in the gas reaction path and growth rate. This study summarized and compared the kinetic parameters of gas-phase reactions during InN MOCVD growth. The InN MOCVD growth in a close-coupled showerhead reactor was simulated with varying kinetic parameters of gas-phase reactions. The effects of kinetic parameters on the gas reaction path were determined by comparing molar concentrations and growth rates of primary In-containing substances. The results show that with varying kinetic parameters, the gas reaction path is likely to be dominated by the addition or trimethylindium pyrolysis path, or to proceed through both reaction paths. Although the reaction path changes with varying kinetic parameters, the predicted growth rates do not vary substantially, because the total rate of transport of In-containing substances to the substrate changes little with the reaction path. The results also indicate that the contribution of pyrolytic products to the growth rate is greater than that of amine, whereas H radicals have minimal effect on the gas reaction path in InN MOCVD growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据