4.3 Article

Predicting stress levels for smartphone users using transfer learning induced residual net

期刊

ENTERTAINMENT COMPUTING
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcom.2023.100609

关键词

Facial expression; Deep learning; Convolutional neural network; Residual network; Transfer learning; Stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Smartphone usage has become integral to our daily lives, but prolonged screen exposure may have negative effects on mental health. This study utilizes a Convolutional Neural Network to analyze facial expressions and recognize users' stress levels, while also addressing the issue of overfitting.
Smartphones have become an essential part of our daily lives, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic when most people are forced to stay at home. This resulted in increased reliance on smartphones for education. Restricted body movements and continuous looking at phone-screens started gradually degrading the mental health especially for children and teenagers. The real-time measurement of stress levels (SLs) generated due to chronic exposure to screens becomes interesting study for the psychologists. Still, there exist void in linking the outcomes found by psychologists with automatic facial-expression-classification (FEC) from technical back-ground. In the current study, the phone users' SL is recognized by analyzing their facial expressions using Convolutional Neural Network. But it is observed that the accuracy gets saturated after certain iterations. This problem is addressed by introducing skip-connections into the architecture and implementing Residual Network. After successful completion of the SL classification, the authors delve into analyzing the training and validation errors with respect to human level performance. It is found that the system is suffering from overfitting. One way to address this issue is to feed more data to the system by Transfer Learning. The proposed work has a potential to open up a new avenue of SL measurement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据