4.2 Article

Investigation of vibration, flexural, tribological and flame retardant properties on rubber crumb-reinforced polymer composites

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14777606231220420

关键词

Polymer composites; rubber crumb; damping; flame retardant; strength; wear

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research aims to fabricate polymer matrix composites with improved mechanical, flame retardant, and damping properties by incorporating waste rubber crumbs as the reinforcement. The experimental results confirmed that the addition of rubber crumb significantly improved the damping characteristics of the material. In addition, the rubber crumb-reinforced composites showed improved mechanical and fire-retardant properties.
This research aims to fabricate polymer matrix composites with improved mechanical, flame retardant, and damping properties by incorporating waste rubber crumbs as the reinforcement. The damping characteristics of the polymer matrix composites reinforced with different weight percentages of rubber crumb such as 0, 2.5%, 5%, and 7.5% were analyzed using a free vibration test. The experimental results confirmed that the addition of rubber crumb significantly improved the damping characteristics of the material. In addition, the rubber crumb-reinforced composites showed improved mechanical and fire-retardant properties. The flexural strength improved exceptionally with the increase in rubber reinforcements up to 7.5%, whereas the tensile strength increased up to 2.5% weight and reduced with the further increase in rubber. Enhanced flame-retardant properties were witnessed in the polymer composites reinforced with rubber crumb than that of the plain Epoxy - Glass fibre composites. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were also used to ascertain the thermal properties. The scanning electron microscope was employed to analyze the surface and fractography of the polymeric composites. The overall results showed the contemporary effect of rubber crumbs on polymer composites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据