4.8 Article

Thermometric Properties of Thio/Selenocyanato-Bridged Spin-Crossover Networks

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 35, 期 22, 页码 9613-9622

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01756

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of optical and vibrational spin-crossover thermometers has significant implications for practical applications and contributes to the advancement of advanced thermometers.
Thermometry is a well-researched topic in materials science, but recent advances in multifunctional complexes have introduced the idea of highly sensitive and accurate contact or noncontact thermometers, which utilize the temperature-dependent evolution of physical properties. In this context, the {[Fe(mu-pyrazine)(2)][Fe(MeOH)(2)][Hg(mu-ECN)(3)(ECN)](2)}2H(2)O (E = S, FeHgS, and E = Se, FeHgSe) three-dimensional networks with spin-transition temperature T-1/2 = 191 K were considered promising materials. Temperature-dependent UV-visible-NIR, IR, and Raman spectra displayed a strong dependence on the peak intensities and positions with temperature. Subsequently, first-principles calculations for low- and high-spin states gave a thorough description of the spectroscopic properties and origins. The unique temperature-dependent variability caused by a combination of gradual spin-crossover (SCO)-active Fe centers and SCO-inactive Fe centers as a reference allowed us to prove the feasibility of the thermometric concept via the characterization of UV-vis-NIR, IR, and Raman intensity ratios. In particular, compared to UV-vis-NIR absorption thermometry, IR and Raman thermometry manifested high thermal sensitivity (S-r) with the best values of 3.2% K-1 at 182 K (FeHgS, IR), 3.1% K-1 at 131 K (FeHgSe, IR), 16.3% K-1 at 184 K (FeHgS, Raman), and 12.1% K-1 at 186 K (FeHgSe, Raman). Overall, the realization of optical and vibrational SCO thermometers has significant implications for the practical application of switchable materials and leads to the development of advanced thermometers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据