4.3 Article

Constructing proximity in popularization discourse: Evidence from lexical bundles in TED talks

期刊

ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 95-109

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2023.10.003

关键词

Popularization discourse; Proximity; Lexical bundles; Indexicality; TED talks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the extent to which phraseological configurations in TED talks encode the five facets of proximity, using Hyland's (2010) proximity as a conceptual framework and lexical bundles as an analytical lens. The findings reveal that TED talks not only communicate knowledge in a layman's version, but also facilitate audience comprehension and mitigate speaker-audience asymmetry, demonstrating both a democratic means of communication and a promotional agenda similar to advertising.
Taking Hyland's (2010) proximity as its conceptual orientation and lexical bundles as its analytical lens, the present study explores the extent to which phraseological configurations in TED talks encode the five facets of proximity. Adopting a corpus-informed discourse analytical approach to lexical bundles (frequently occurring four-word sequences in text), we aim to describe the popularizing features TED talks present. Lexical bundles are identified and extracted from a corpus of 500 TED talks totaling about 1.1 million words, followed by an analysis of their indexicality related to proximity. This study reveals that, in addition to communicating the lay version of knowledge, TED talks are devoted to both a democratic means of communication by facilitating audience comprehension and mitigating speaker-audience asymmetry and to a promotional agenda not dissimilar to that of advertising. These characteristics allow for movement between proximity of commitment and proximity of membership. This study demonstrates the indexical function of lexical bundles, expanding on their role as a discovery tool for obtaining a generic profile of a particular genre.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据