4.6 Article

Multistep Improvement of Pilot-Scale 21700 Cells for Increased Fast-Charging Capability: Combining Optimized Electrolyte, Cell Design and Fast-Charging Protocol

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ad0c65

关键词

lithium-ion battery; cell design; fast-charging; electrolyte; synergetic effects; pilot-scale 21700 cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the charging time was reduced by changing different cell- and charging parameters while keeping the cell chemistry unchanged. Through systematic experiments and optimization, methods and techniques for reducing the charging time under different conditions were obtained.
In this publication, different cell- and charging parameters (advanced fast-charging protocol, 21700 tab design, electrolyte composition) are changed in a systematic step-by-step approach to reduce charging time while keeping the anode and cathode cell chemistry and electrodes (graphite-NMC 622 full cell) unchanged. Preliminary tests were carried out using 3-electrode full cells with a Li metal reference electrode to identify charging conditions that avoid Li metal deposition. In addition, the effects of the anode potential are investigated in 3-electrode full cells with a Li metal reference electrode. The optimized charging protocols from the 3-electrode full cells were then transferred to 2-electrode pilot-scale 21700 full cells. Two different tab designs (1 x 1 welded tabs and 120 x 125 foil tabs) were used in these cells. To improve the charging time further, an electrolyte with higher ionic conductivity was used under the best conditions from the previous tests. Cross-sectional in situ optical microscopy was used to visualize the transport effects within the anode. In the optimized 21700 cell (advanced fast-charging, 120 x 125 foil tabs, better Li+ transport in the electrolyte), the synergistic effects of the three different optimization steps reduced the charging time to 80% SOC by 46% compared to the baseline cell.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据