3.8 Article

Quantifying digital health inequality across a national healthcare system

期刊

BMJ HEALTH & CARE INFORMATICS
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100809

关键词

Health Equity; Informatics; Electronic Health Records

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to measure the factors associated with digital utilization across primary care providers in England. The results show a significant association between increased population deprivation and reduced digital utilization. These findings are concerning as they suggest potential healthcare inequalities driven by technology. Targeted interventions are needed to prevent digital disparities from translating into disparities in health outcomes.
ObjectivesDigital health inequality, observed as differential utilisation of digital tools between population groups, has not previously been quantified in the National Health Service (NHS). Deployment of universal digital health interventions, including a national smartphone app and online primary care services, allows measurement of digital inequality across a nation. We aimed to measure population factors associated with digital utilisation across 6356 primary care providers serving the population of England.MethodsWe used multivariable regression to test association of population and provider characteristics (including patient demographics, socioeconomic deprivation, disease burden, prescribing burden, geography and healthcare provider resource) with activation of two independent digital services during 2021/2022.ResultsWe find a significant adjusted association between increased population deprivation and reduced digital utilisation across both interventions. Multivariable regression coefficients for most deprived quintiles correspond to 4.27 million patients across England where deprivation is associated with non-activation of the NHS App.ConclusionResults are concerning for technologically driven widening of healthcare inequalities. Targeted incentive to digital is necessary to prevent digital disparity from becoming health outcomes disparity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据