4.7 Article

COVID-19 Interventions in an informal settlement: A spatial analysis of accessibility in Kibera, Kenya

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103704

关键词

COVID-19; Intervention; Informal settlement; Slum; Resilience; Pedestrian

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a methodology to explore pedestrian accessibility in informal settlements. The methodology is applied to pandemic intervention sites in Nairobi's Kibera area during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study assesses pedestrian accessibility by calculating isochrones and identifies unequal access to intervention sites due to indirect routes.
This paper introduces a methodology to explore pedestrian accessibility in informal settlements. This methodology is applied to pandemic intervention sites in Nairobi's Kibera area for 3.5 months (14 April to 31 July 2020) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Freely available transportation network data and open-source GIS software are utilised. Isochrones, areas of equal travel time, are calculated to assess pedestrian accessibility (walk times) from 30,231 Kibera structures to 138 COVID-19 stationary intervention sites. These sites aid in virus control, resource distribution, and COVID-related medical support. Travel times are determined considering different terrain slopes. Unequal access to intervention sites is observed due to indirect routes. Shortest walks (up to 21.5 min) are to handwashing and food distribution points, while longer walks (up to 61.5 min) are to interventions with fewer sites or localised clustering, such as baby product distribution. This simple accessibility analysis helps identify service gaps during crises, aiding planning authorities and communities. Our methodology offers insight into travel patterns in slums and has wider applicability to assess the relationships between transport infrastructure provision and resilience in informal settlements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据