4.3 Article

Novel procedure for measuring the saturation of the pore-pressure system in piezocone tips

期刊

GEOTECHNIQUE LETTERS
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 1-5

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1680/jgele.23.00034

关键词

in situ testing; pore pressures; quality control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a novel device that measures the saturation degree of piezocone prior to a cone penetration test. The proposed method has the potential to provide quality benchmarks for CPTU and can assess whether saturation was lost during the cone penetration test. Preliminary results show a clear correlation between the proposed parameter and the saturation degree of filters and/or the overall pore-pressure measurement system.
Uncertainty in the measurement of the cone penetration test with pore-water pressure measurement (i.e. piezocone testing CPTU) can be caused by an equipment malfunction, poor calibration and maintenance of sensors, but also by a lack of saturation of the piezocone. The standards allow for many different options in terms of filters, saturation fluids and methodologies. The novel device described herein aims at measuring in a very simple manner the degree of saturation of the piezocone prior to testing. Because the quality of pore-water pressure measurements can currently only be assessed a posteriori - that is, after the test has been completed, or at best while testing, the methodology proposed herein has the potential to provide quality benchmarks for CPTU. The tool measures a parameter inspired by the well-established Skempton coefficient B, which is routinely used to estimate the sample saturation prior to laboratory testing. Furthermore, by performing the same measurement after a CPTU test, it is possible to assess whether saturation was lost during cone penetration. The paper describes a set of preliminary results that show a clear correlation between the saturation degree of filters and/or of the overall pore-pressure measurement system and the B parameter proposed, thus providing a proof of concept in laboratory settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据