3.8 Article

Freedom and self-ownership: An emergence theory of free will

期刊

PSYCHOANALYSIS SELF AND CONTEXT
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/24720038.2023.2281404

关键词

Complexity; emergence; freedom; free will; self-ownership

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perspectives on freedom, liberty, agency, creativity, and free will have a rich history in philosophy, psychology, neuroscience, and psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis emphasizes the expansion of personal freedom, agency, individuality, creativity, and self-ownership for patients. This article examines the meaning of freedom, the exercise of free will, and the relationship between perceived freedom and actual freedom, with a focus on emotional health and therapeutic action. It also explores an emergence theory of free will and the significance of self-ownership in experiencing freedom of choice, providing a clinical example of authentic free choice.
Perspectives on freedom, liberty, agency, creativity, and free will have a rich and varied history in philosophy, psychology, neuroscience, and psychoanalysis. Central to psychoanalysis, we want nothing for our patients, nor from our patients, if not the expansion of their personal freedom, agency, individuality, creativity, and self-ownership. What is freedom, exactly? What does it mean to have and to exercise free will? What does it mean to be truly creative? Do we have true choices, or are we overdetermined puppets faltering under the illusion of self-generated acts of freedom? Does feeling free to choose, and then perhaps acting to choose, equate with actual freedom? These perspectives and questions are examined in light of how we think about emotional health and the phenomenology of therapeutic action. This article explores an emergence theory of free will and the centrality of self-ownership in understanding and experiencing freedom of choice. A clinical example is offered in the spirit of what it might look like and what it might mean to enable authentic free choice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据