4.6 Article

Supporting responsive parenting in real-world implementation: minimal effective dose of the Video Interaction Project

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41390-023-02916-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study shows that a single visit to the Video Interaction Project (VIP) can significantly increase responsive parenting behaviors, and a second visit further enhances the impact. Therefore, VIP should be offered widely, regardless of the ability to attend multiple visits.
Background: The Video Interaction Project (VIP) is a healthcare-based intervention that provides real-time video-feedback of parent-child play and reading interactions to families with children aged 0 to 36 months. Although evidence from randomized controlled trials demonstrates improved early relational health, including responsive parenting, after three to five VIP visits, the minimal effective dose in real-world implementations is unknown. This study aimed to determine the minimal effective dose of VIP during a real-world implementation for changing responsive parenting behaviors.Methods: We performed a longitudinal prospective study of 183 dyads at a public hospital pediatric clinic. Responsive parenting behaviors were assessed with an observational checklist utilized as part of standard VIP practice at baseline and two follow-up VIP visits.Results: Multilevel models adjusted for baseline sociodemographics (child's sex and age, and maternal education) and time between visits showed that responsive parenting behaviors during parent-child reading and play significantly increased after a single VIP visit (Cohen's d = 0.52, p < 0.05) with additional impact following completion of a second visit (cumulative for 2 visits: d = 0.76, p < 0.05).Conclusions: A single VIP visit is associated with increased responsive parenting behaviors. Findings support offering VIP widely, regardless of capacity to ensure attendance at multiple visits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据