4.6 Article

Genetic Correction of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells From a Deaf Patient With MYO7A Mutation Results in Morphologic and Functional Recovery of the Derived Hair Cell-Like Cells

期刊

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 561-571

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0252

关键词

Human induced pluripotent stem cells; MYO7A; Deafness; Genetic correction; Inner ear hair cells; Rescue

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB967902, 2014CB541705]
  2. National Development Program of Important Scientific Instruments [2013YQ030595]
  3. Strategically Guiding Scientific Special Project from Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA04020202-23]
  4. Opening Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and Application [SMFA12K02]
  5. TZ-1 Application Program [KYTZ01-0901-FB-003]
  6. Chinese National Science Foundation [81570932]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genetic correction of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) induced from somatic cells of patients with sensorineural hearing loss (caused by hereditary factors) is a promising method for its treatment. The correction of gene mutations in iPSCs could restore the normal function of cells and provide a rich source of cells for transplantation. In the present study, iPSCs were generated from a deaf patient with compound heterozygous MYO7A mutations (c.1184G>A and c.4118C>T; P-iPSCs), the asymptomatic father of the patient (MYO7A c.1184G>A mutation; CF-iPSCs), and a normal donor (MYO7A(WT/WT); C-iPSCs). One of MYO7A mutation sites (c.4118C>T) in the P-iPSCs was corrected using CRISPR/Cas9. The corrected iPSCs (CP-iPSCs) retained cell pluripotency and normal karyotypes. Hair cell-like cells induced from CP-iPSCs showed restored organization of stereocilia-like protrusions; moreover, the electrophysiological function of these cells was similar to that of cells induced from C-iPSCs and CF-iPSCs. These results might facilitate the development of iPSC-based gene therapy for genetic disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据