4.6 Article

Protein-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Ameliorate and Reduce Aβ Deposition of Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 293-305

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2016-0081

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Protein-iPSC; 5XFAD mice; Proteomic analysis; Oligodendrocyte

资金

  1. NRF [2015R1A2A1A05001794, 2014M3C7A1046047, 2015M3C7A1028790, 2015M3A9B4051041]
  2. MRC [2012R1A5A2A44671346]
  3. Innovative Research Institute for Cell Therapy [A062260]
  4. KHIDI [HI14C1541, HI14C1277]
  5. Korea Health Promotion Institute [HI06C0874030015] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0030738, 2015M3C7A1028790, 2015M3A9B4051041] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transplantation of stem cells into the brain attenuates functional deficits in the central nervous system via cell replacement, the release of specific neurotransmitters, and the production of neurotrophic factors. To identify patient-specific and safe stem cells for treating Alzheimer's disease (AD), we generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from mouse skin fibroblasts by treating protein extracts of embryonic stem cells. These reprogrammed cells were pluripotent but nontumorigenic. Here, we report that protein-iPSCs differentiated into glial cells and decreased plaque depositions in the 5XFAD transgenic AD mouse model. We also found that transplanted protein-iPSCs mitigated the cognitive dysfunction observed in these mice. Proteomic analysis revealed that oligodendrocyte-related genes were upregulated in brains injected with protein-iPSCs, providing new insights into the potential function of protein-iPSCs. Taken together, our data indicate that protein-iPSCs might be a promising therapeutic approach for AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据