4.6 Article

Therapeutic Prospective of Infused Allogenic Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Traumatic Brain Injury Mice: A Longitudinal Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Assessment

期刊

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 316-329

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2016-0087

关键词

Mesenchymal stem cells; Magnetic resonance imaging; Stem cell therapy; Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Traumatic brain injury

资金

  1. Defence Research and Development Organization, Ministry of Defence, Government of India [INM-311, 4.1]
  2. Council of Medical Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improved therapeutic assessment of experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI), using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), would immensely benefit its therapeutic management. Neurometabolite patterns at injury site, measured with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) after MSCs transplantation, may serve as a bio-indicator of the recovery mechanism. This study used in vivo magnetic resonance imaging and1H-MRSto evaluate the therapeutic prospects of implanted MSCsat injury site in experimental mice longitudinally up to 21 days. Negative tissue contrast and cytotoxic edema formation were observed in susceptibility-based contrast (T2*) and an apparent diffusion coefficient map, respectively. Lesion site showed decreased N-acetylaspartate, total choline, myo-inositol, total creatine, glutamate-glutamine complex, and taurine neurometabolic concentrations by 1H-MRS investigation. There was a considerable decrease in locomotor activity, depression index, and cognitive index after TBI. It may, therefore, be inferred that MSC transplantation prompted recovery by decreasing negative signals and edema, restoring metabolites to baseline concentrations, and enhancing behavioral activity. Overall findings support the potential of MSC transplantation for the enhancement of endogenous neuroprotective responses, which may provide future clinical applications for translating laboratory research into therapeutic clinical advances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据