4.6 Article

Directed Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Toward Placode- Derived Spiral Ganglion-Like Sensory Neurons

期刊

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 923-936

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sctm.16-0032

关键词

Embryonic stem cells; Cellular therapy; Neural differentiation; Stem cell; Transplantation; Neural induction; Progenitor cells

资金

  1. American Otological Society Clinician Scientist Award
  2. Triological Society/American College of Surgeons Clinician Scientist Award
  3. Department of Otolaryngology of Northwestern University
  4. NIH K08 Clinician Scientist Award [K08DC13829-02]
  5. office of Naval Research [N00014-12-1-0173]
  6. NIH [P30 NS081774]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to generate spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) from stem cells is a necessary prerequisite for development of cell-replacement therapies for sensorineural hearing loss. We present a protocol that directs human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) toward a purified population of otic neuronal progenitors (ONPs) and SGN-like cells. Between 82% and 95% of these cells express SGN molecular markers, they preferentially extend neurites to the cochlear nucleus rather than nonauditory nuclei, and they generate action potentials. The protocol follows an in vitro stepwise recapitulation of developmental events inherent to normal differentiation of hESCs into SGNs, resulting in efficient sequential generation of nonneuronal ectoderm, preplacodal ectoderm, early prosensory ONPs, late ONPs, and cells with cellular and molecular characteristics of human SGNs. We thus describe the sequential signaling pathways that generate the early and later lineage species in the human SGN lineage, thereby better describing key developmental processes. The results indicate that our protocol generates cells that closely replicate the phenotypic characteristics of human SGNs, advancing the process of guiding hESCs to states serving inner-ear cell-replacement therapies and possible next-generation hybrid auditory prostheses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据