Long-term maintenance treatment of rosacea: experts' opinion

BackgroundRosacea is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis characterized by remissions and flares. Although the rosacea active treatment phase is well established, the long-term maintenance phase is still challenging.ObjectiveTo discuss and make recommendations on how to treat patients during the long-term maintenance phase for the main rosacea phenotypes.MethodsA panel of six board-certified Brazilian dermatologists and one American dermatologist gathered to compose a consensus based upon an initial statement on how to treat rosacea during the long-term maintenance phase based on the methodology Nominal Group Technique. The experts discussed each factor based upon an initial statement on how to treat rosacea patients in the long-term maintenance phase. A sequence of comprehensive narrative reviews was performed; a questionnaire preparation about the definition of the maintenance phase and its management was presented; an interpersonal discussion and ranking of the ideas were conducted. Recommendations were made if the specialists had 75% agreement.ResultsThe maintenance treatment phase, which starts by achieving IGA 0 or 1 grades at the active phase, should be considered at least during the 9-month period after remission. The recommendations of all treatments target this period. Daily skincare regimen and sunscreen are crucial. Active treatment phase should be recommended if signs or symptoms reappear or worsen.ConclusionMaintenance phase success depends on patient's adherence to daily skin care, appropriate treatments, continued follow-up with dermatologist, and self-assessment to identify new signs and symptoms indicating disease relapse.

Automated summary

This study aims to discuss and make recommendations on how to treat the main rosacea phenotypes during the long-term maintenance phase. A consensus was reached by a panel of Brazilian and American dermatologists using the Nominal Group Technique. Comprehensive narrative reviews were conducted, and recommendations were made based on 75% agreement among the specialists.