4.3 Article

Cusp overlap method for self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30910

关键词

cusp overlap; self-expanding; TAVR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the rates of new PPM implantation between patients undergoing TAVR with self-expanding valves using the conventional three-cusp technique and the cusp-overlap technique. The results showed that the cusp-overlap technique significantly reduced the rates of complete heart block and PPM implantation during hospitalization and at 30 days compared to the standard three-cusp technique.
BackgroundConduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remains a common complication for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), particularly when self-expanding (SE) valves are used.AimsWe compared in-hospital and 30-day rates of new PPM implantation between patients undergoing TAVR with SE valves using the conventional three-cusp coplanar implantation technique and the cusp-overlap technique.MethodsWe retrospectively compared patients without a pre-existing PPM who underwent a TAVR procedure with SE Evolut R or PRO valves using the cusp-overlap technique from July 2018 to September 2020 (n = 519) to patients who underwent TAVR using standard three-cusp technique from April 2016 to March 2017 (n = 128) in two high volume Canadian centers.ResultsThere was no significant difference in baseline RBBB between the groups (10.4% vs. 13.2; p = 0.35). The rate of in-hospital new complete heart block (9.4% vs. 23.4%; p <= 0.001) and PPM implantation (8% vs. 21%; p <= 0.001) were significantly reduced when using the cusp-overlap technique. The incidence of new LBBB (30.4% vs. 29%; p = 0.73) was similar. At 30 days, the rates of new complete heart block (11% vs. 23%; p <= 0.001) and PPM implantation (10% vs. 21%, p <= 0.001) remained significantly lower in the cusp-overlap group, while the rate of new LBBB (35% vs. 30%; p = 0.73) was similar.ConclusionCusp-overlap approach offers several potential technical advantages compared to standard three-cusp view, and may result in lower PPM rates in TAVR with SE Evolut valve.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据