4.6 Article

The analysis of mixing performance of sand and gravel in a rotating drum by DEM

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL PARTICLE MECHANICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40571-023-00693-9

关键词

Rotating drum; Sand; Gravel; Mixing uniformity; Discrete element method; Response surface methodology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study simulated the mixing process of sand and gravel in a rotating drum using the discrete element method and investigated the quantitative relationship between mixing uniformity and rotation speed, material filling rate, and distance of rods inside the drum. The results showed that rotation speed had the greatest impact on mixing uniformity, followed by the distance of rods, while the material filling rate had a minor influence. The interaction between the factors also significantly affected the mixing uniformity.
Material mixing in a rotating drum is a complex movement process, and the material mixing uniformity impacts product quality. The mixing of sand and gravel in the rotating drum was simulated by the discrete element method to study the quantitative relationship between the mixing uniformity and its influencing factors and analyze the mixing performance. The quantitative relationships between mixing uniformity and rotation speed of the rotating drum, material filling rate, and distance of rods inside the rotating drum were established based on the response surface method. Results indicate that the rotation speed of the rotating drum has the most significant influence on the mixing uniformity, followed by the distance of rods inside the rotating drum, and the material filling rate has a minor influence on the mixing uniformity. The interaction between the three factors significantly affects the mixing uniformity. The areas where the particles move in the rotating drum are divided into active and inactive areas. Rods inside the rotating drum can accelerate the movement of the particles in the inactive area, relieve particle segregation and promote particle mixing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据