4.4 Article

A practice quit model to test early efficacy of medications for alcohol use disorder in a randomized clinical trial

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-023-06504-6

关键词

Alcohol use disorder; Pharmacotherapy; Cue-reactivity; Varenicline; Naltrexone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study tested a novel human laboratory model in which individuals with intrinsic motivation to change their drinking engaged in a 6-day practice quit attempt. The results showed that the medication had no significant effects on the drinking behavior during the practice quit period, but participants significantly reduced their drinking during the entire medication treatment period.
Rationale Screening novel medications for alcohol use disorder (AUD) requires models that are both efficient and ecologically-valid. Ideally, such models would be associated with the outcomes of a given medication in clinical trials.Objectives To test a novel human laboratory model in which individuals with intrinsic motivation to change their drinking engage in a practice quit attempt consisting of 6 days of complete abstinence from alcohol.Method Individuals with current AUD completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of naltrexone (50 mg), varenicline (2 mg bid), or matched placebo. Participants were titrated onto the study medication for 1 week prior to starting the 6-day practice quit attempt. During the practice quit attempt, participants completed daily interviews with research staff. All participants completed an alcohol cue-exposure paradigm before starting the study medication and after 2 weeks of study medication.Results There were no significant medication effect on drinks per drinking day (F(2,49) = 0.66, p = 0.52) or percent days abstinent (F(2,49) = 0.14, p = 0.87) during the 6-day practice quit period. There were no medication effects on alcohol cue-reactivity (F(2,44) = 0.80, p = 0.46). Notably, participants sharply reduced their drinking during the entire 13-day medication treatment period, as compared to reducing only during the 6-day practice quit period. During the total medication period, higher levels of motivation to change was associated with higher percent days abstinent (F(1,49) = 8.12, p < 0.01).Conclusions This study reports mostly null findings, which challenges us to decompose its nuanced design to consider model refinements. Possible changes to the model include considering the requirement for intrinsic motivation for change, including a longer practice quit period, encompassing the medication administration timeframe in the practice quit period, increasing the required sample size for signal detection, and examining a post COVID-19 pandemic cohort.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据