4.7 Article

Energy balance and body composition after switch between integrase strand transfer inhibitors and doravirine among people with HIV

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkad363

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that switching to doravirine treatment may be associated with reductions in 24-hour energy expenditure, weight, trunk fat, and fat-free mass among HIV patients with over 10% weight gain.
Background: Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are associated with excessive weight gain among a subset of persons with HIV (PWH), due to unclear mechanisms. We assessed energy intake (EI) and expenditure (EE) following switch off and onto INSTIs.Methods: PWH with >10% weight gain on an INSTI-based regimen switched INSTI to doravirine for 12 weeks, then back to INSTI for 12 weeks while keeping their remaining regimen stable. Twenty-four-hour EE, EI and weight were measured on INSTI, following switch to doravirine, and upon INSTI restart. Mixed models analysed changes over time.Results: Among 18 participants, unadjusted 24 h EE decreased by 83 (95% CI -181 to 14) kcal following switch to doravirine, and by 2 (-105 to 100) kcal after INSTI restart; energy balance (EE-EI) increased by 266 (-126 to 658) kcal from Week 0 to Week 12, and decreased by 3 (-429 to 423) kcal from Week 12 to Week 24. Trends toward weight loss occurred following switch to doravirine [mean -1.25 (-3.18 to 0.69) kg] and when back on INSTI [-0.47 (-2.45 to 1.52) kg]. Trunk fat decreased on doravirine [-474 (-1398 to 449) g], with some regain following INSTI restart [199 (-747 to 1145) g]. Fat-free mass decreased on doravirine [-491 (-1399 to 417) g] and increased slightly after INSTI restart [178 (-753 to 1108) g].Conclusions: Among PWH with >10% weight gain on an INSTI, switch to doravirine was associated with a trend towards decreases in 24 h EE, weight, trunk fat mass and fat-free mass. Observed changes were not significant, but suggest a mild weight-suppressive effect of doravirine among PWH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据