4.2 Article

Approaching the minimum lattice thermal conductivity in TiCoSb half-Heusler alloys by intensified point-defect phonon scattering

期刊

MATERIALS ADVANCES
卷 4, 期 24, 页码 6655-6664

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ma00923h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates a multi-alloying approach to reduce the lattice thermal conductivity of Half-Heusler alloys. By creating large point defects through heavy isovalent substitution, the enhanced point defect phonon scattering effectively lowers the lattice thermal conductivity.
Half-Heusler (HH) alloys based on TiCoSb are becoming popular semiconducting materials for mid-temperature thermoelectric (TE) applications, due to their superior Seebeck coefficient, moderate electrical conductivity, and excellent mechanical properties. However, their practical applicability is mainly limited by their high lattice thermal conductivity. Here, we show how a multi-alloying approach that involves co-substitution of Zr and Hf on the Ti site and Bi on the Sb site can significantly lower the heat transport of the TiCo0.85Fe0.15Sb alloy due to enhanced mass and strain-field fluctuations in the lattice. The substantial rise in point-defect phonon scattering leads to a sharp reduction in the lattice thermal conductivity from 8 to 2 W m-1 K-1 at similar to 300 K and from 5 to 1.74 W m-1 K-1 at similar to 843 K in Ti0.5Zr0.2Hf0.3Co0.85Fe0.15Sb0.96Bi0.4. The achieved thermal conductivity is the lowest value reported so far among TiCoSb-based alloys. Importantly, the reduction in thermal conductivity outweighs the concomitant decrease in the power factor, ultimately leading to an improved thermoelectric figure of merit ZT. Our findings show that creating large point defects through heavy isovalent substitution is an effective approach to significantly reduce the phonon transport in HH alloys. Enhanced point defect phonons scattering through huge isovalent substitution substantially reduces the lattice thermal conductivity of half-Heusler alloys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据