4.8 Article

CeNCl-CeO2 Heterojunction-Modified Ni Catalysts for Efficient Electroreduction of CO2 to CO

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202301575

关键词

CeNCl-CeO2 heterojunction; CO2 electroreduction; co-catalyst; electron transfer; nickel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Renewable electricity-powered electrochemical CO2 reduction is a promising method to convert exhaust CO2 into valuable chemicals and fuels. In this work, a CeNCl-CeO2 heterojunction-modified Ni catalyst was synthesized and showed high CO2RR catalytic performance. The catalyst exhibited excellent CO selectivity and stability.
Renewable-electricity-powered electrochemical CO2 reduction (CO2RR) is considered one of the most promising ways to convert exhaust CO2 into value-added chemicals and fuels. Among various CO2RR products, CO is of great significance since it can be directly used as feedstock to produce chemical products through the Fischer-Tropsch process. However, the CO2-to-CO electrocatalytic process is often accompanied by a kinetically competing side reaction: H-2 evolution reaction (HER). Designing electrocatalysts with tunable electronic structures is an attractive strategy to enhance CO selectivity. In this work, a CeNCl-CeO2 heterojunction-modified Ni catalyst is successfully synthesized with high CO2RR catalytic performance by the impregnation-calcination method. Benefiting from the strong electron interaction between the CeNCl-CeO2 heterojunction and Ni nanoparticles (NPs), the catalytic performance is greatly improved. Maximal CO Faradaic efficiency (FE) is up to 90% at -0.8 V (vs RHE), plus good stability close to 12 h. Detailed electrochemical tests and density functional theory (DFT) calculation results reveal that the introduction of the CeNCl-CeO2 heterojunction tunes the electronic structure of Ni NPs. The positively charged Ni center leads to an enhanced local electronic structure, thus promoting the activation of CO2 and the adsorption of *COOH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据