4.2 Article

High nitrogen concentration causes G2/M arrest in Hanseniaspora vineae

期刊

YEAST
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/yea.3911

关键词

ammonium; cell cycle; G2/M arrest; Hanseniaspora vineae; quiescense; yeasts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of varying nitrogen concentrations on the cell cycle progression of Hanseniaspora vineae. The findings suggest that nitrogen excess disrupts cell cycle progression and induces G2/M arrest in H. vineae after reaching the stationary phase. Additionally, nitrogen excess leads to a decrease in cell viability and various cellular damages.
Yeasts have been widely used as a model to better understand cell cycle mechanisms and how nutritional and genetic factors can impact cell cycle progression. While nitrogen scarcity is well known to modulate cell cycle progression, the relevance of nitrogen excess for microorganisms has been overlooked. In our previous work, we observed an absence of proper entry into the quiescent state in Hanseniaspora vineae and identified a potential link between this behavior and nitrogen availability. Furthermore, the Hanseniaspora genus has gained attention due to a significant loss of genes associated with DNA repair and cell cycle. Thus, the aim of our study was to investigate the effects of varying nitrogen concentrations on H. vineae's cell cycle progression. Our findings demonstrated that nitrogen excess, regardless of the source, disrupts cell cycle progression and induces G2/M arrest in H. vineae after reaching the stationary phase. Additionally, we observed a viability decline in H. vineae cells in an ammonium-dependent manner, accompanied by increased production of reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial hyperpolarization, intracellular acidification, and DNA fragmentation. Overall, our study highlights the events of the cell cycle arrest in H. vineae induced by nitrogen excess and attempts to elucidate the possible mechanism triggering this absence of proper entry into the quiescent state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据