4.0 Article

Autistic mechanisms in a case of pornography addiction

期刊

FORUM DER PSYCHOANALYSE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00451-023-00524-w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the importance of autistic phenomena and autistic defence formations in the treatment of patients with self-esteem problems, relationship disorders, and pornography addiction. Based on a case study, the author describes the challenges faced in establishing a three-dimensional connection with the patient and the use of autistic forms in pornography addiction to cope with fears. The article highlights the struggle of being recognized as a three-dimensional object by the patient.
Based on the description of the treatment of a patient with pronounced self-esteem problems, severe relationship disorders and pornography addiction, the author illustrates the extent to which autistic phenomena and autistic defence formations play an important role in the treatment of patients who could also be described as narcissistic or neurotic from a different perspective. After an introduction to the theoretical considerations of Bick, Tustin, Meltzer, S. Klein and Ogden on this topic, the case of a young man with a migration background and early trauma due to separation is described, in which the autistic phenomena and the autistic defence only became apparent during the course of treatment. In particular, this concerns the patient's initial inability to perceive the analyst as a receiving and containing three-dimensional object and to enter into an emotional exchange with him. Instead, the patient clung concretely to the analyst in the sense of an adhesive identification according to Meltzer. In his pornography addiction, he used sexual arousal in conjunction with the image of the ideal female body as autistic form according to Tustin to ward off fears of falling apart. The author describes how he had to struggle for a long time to be recognized by the patient as a three-dimensional object.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据