4.7 Article

Photocatalytic hydrogen production from seawater by TiO2/RuO2 hybrid nanofiber with enhanced light absorption

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 654, 期 -, 页码 1010-1019

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.10.074

关键词

Photocatalytic; Seawater; Hydrogen production; Titanium dioxide; Ruthenium oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compared to hydrogen production through pure water photocatalysis, utilizing seawater directly for hydrogen production is more in line with the principles of sustainable development. RuO2 and TiO2 have been widely recognized to exhibit good stability in seawater. This study investigates hydrogen production in simulated seawater using a RuO2-modified TiO2 model system. The results show that the hydrogen production activity of TiO2/RuO2 nanofibers in simulated seawater is comparable to that in pure water.
Compared to hydrogen production through pure water photocatalysis, the direct utilization of seawater for hydrogen production aligns better with the principles of sustainable development. Seawater, however, contains impurity ions like Na+ and Cl-, which pose higher demands on photocatalysts. It is widely acknowledged that RuO2 and TiO2 demonstrate excellent stability in seawater. Consequently, this study focuses on the model system of RuO2-modified TiO2 for investigating hydrogen production in simulated seawater. TiO2/RuO2 nanofibers (NFs) were synthesized via a one-step electrospinning method, ensuring intimate contact between the two components. The hydrogen production activity of TiO2/RuO2 NFs in simulated seawater nearly matches that in pure water. Remarkably, RuO2 serves as an oxidation cocatalyst, effectively scavenging holes from the valence band of TiO2 and enhancing the separation efficiency of electrons and holes. Interestingly, Cl- ions, similar to RuO2, contribute to reducing excess holes. This study lays the groundwork for future research into hydrogen production from seawater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据