4.3 Article

Exploring the status and critical issues in mixed methods research in doctoral nursing education in the Philippines

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 1-7

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.10.008

关键词

Graduate nursing education; Mentoring; Mixed methods research

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the status and critical issues in conducting, mentoring, and training mixed methods research (MMR) in doctoral nursing programs in the Philippines. Four key themes emerge, including perceptions on the use of MMR, facilitators and barriers to its use, and recommendations to promote its use. The findings suggest that providing support for doctoral nursing students and faculty can enhance the use of MMR in these programs.
Background: Mixed methods research (MMR) can be a pathway for doctoral nursing students to create innovative and noble contributions for the advancement of nursing theory, practice, and education. Several issues and challenges must be identified to successfully train, mentor, and support doctoral nursing students in conducting MMR.Aim: The study aimed to explore the status and critical issues in conducting, mentoring, and training MMR in doctoral nursing programs in the Philippines.Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted by performing semi-structured online interviews with 10 purposively selected participants who were faculty and educators with doctoral degrees, involved in teaching and mentoring MMR among doctoral nursing students in the last 10 years. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis.Findings: Four key themes emerged, namely, (1) perceptions on the use of MMR, (2) facilitators to use MMR, (3) barriers to the use of MMR, and (4) recommendations to promote the use of MMR focused on the student, faculty, and educational institution levels.Conclusion: Providing educational, institutional, and research support for doctoral nursing students and faculty could flourish the use of MMR in doctoral nursing programs with deeper meaning and reasoning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据