4.7 Article

[C12-2-C12mim][Br2]-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of hollow NiO microspheres for near-room temperature measurement of H2S

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 398, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2023.134711

关键词

Hollow NiO microspheres; Geminal dicationic ionic liquid; Appropriate residuals; H 2 S sensing performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hollow NiO microspheres were prepared using a one-step hydrothermal method assisted by a geminal dicationic ionic liquid, and the structures and properties of the microspheres can be controlled by adjusting the concentration of the ionic liquid and reaction temperature. Among them, the NiO hollow microspheres prepared at 600 degrees C exhibited the most excellent gas sensing performance, making them a promising candidate material for highly sensitive gas sensors.
Hollow NiO microspheres were prepared using one-step hydrothermal method assisted by geminal dicationic ionic liquid (DIL) 1, 2-bis (N-dodecylimidazolyl) ethane bromide ([C12-2-C12mim][Br2]). The structures of the prepared microspheres can be controlled by adjusting the concentration of ionic liquid and reaction temperature. Furthermore, the amount of ionic liquid residue in these microspheres can also be controlled by changing the calcination temperature. Among them, the NiO hollow microspheres prepared by calcining the precursor at 600 degrees C (Ni1-600) in air display the most excellent gas sensing performance, including high response (35.6-100 ppm H2S) and low working temperature (50 degrees C). The excellent gas sensing performance of the Ni1-600 is attributed to the ionic liquid residue with appropriate content, which enhances the interaction between the analyte and the sensing material. The strong interaction effectively increases the sensitivity and reduces the working temperature of the sensor. The NiO hollow microspheres are expected to be a promising candidate material for the highly sensitive H2S gas sensor at near room temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据