4.7 Article

Freshwater lake ice thickness derived using surface-based X- and Ku-band FMCW scatterometers

期刊

COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 115-126

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.09.012

关键词

Lake ice; Freshwater; Scatterometer; Ice thickness; UW-Scat; Active microwave

资金

  1. European Space Agency (ESTEC) [4000103590/11/NL/FF/fk, 4000106960/12/NL/BJ/lf]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  4. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Time series of ground-based X- and Ku-band frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar data are used to derive ice thickness for bubbled freshwater lake ice with heterogeneous snow cover under the assumption of interactions in range occurring at the ice-snow and ice-water interface. Once adjusted for the refractive index of ice and slant range, the distance between peak returns agrees with in-situ ice thickness observations. Ice thicknesses are derived from the distance of peak returns in range acquired in the off-nadir incidence angle range 21 degrees-60 degrees. Derived ice thicknesses are compared to in-situ measurements, an upward-looking acoustic sonar (Shallow Water Ice-Profiler (SWIP)), and a one-dimensional thermodynamic lake ice model (Canadian Lake Ice Model (CLIMo)). Median ice thicknesses derived with University of Waterloo X- and Ku-band scatterometers (UW-Scat) agreed well with in-situ measurements (R-2 = 0.953 and 0.964), SWIP (R-2 = 0.842 and 0.893), and Canadian Lake Ice Model (CLIMo) simulations using 25% of terrestrial snowpack scenario, respectively. UW-Scat derived ice thicknesses produced root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.053 and 0.088 m for X- and Ku-band, respectively, relative to in-situ ice thickness measurements. This study is the first FMCW X- and Ku-band off-nadir approach to observe interactions at the snow-ice and ice-water interface to derive ice thickness. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据