4.0 Article

Variability of the HCV core region and host genetic and epigenetic factors can predict the response to pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy in genotype 1b hepatitis C patients from Serbia

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 75, 期 3, 页码 251-262

出版社

INST BIOLOSKA ISTRAZIVANJA SINISA STANKOVIC
DOI: 10.2298/ABS230316020K

关键词

hepatitis C virus; variability of HCV core region; IL28B; RASSF1A and p16 methylation; therapy response

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amino acid substitutions in the HCV core region combined with IL28B genotypes and RASSF1A/p16 methylation may influence the response to PEG-IFN/RBV therapy in patients with genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C.
Variations in the hepatitis C virus (HCV) core sequence have been related to disease progression and response to antiviral therapy. Previously we showed that the methylation status of RASSF1A and p16 genes, and IL28B genotypes affects the response to pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) therapy. Herein we investigated whether amino acid (aa) substitutions in the HCV core region alone or in combination with IL28B genotypes and RASSF1A/p16 methylation affect the response to PEG-IFN/RBV therapy and liver disease progression. Among 29 examined patients, we found no association between single aa substitutions and response to therapy. However, we observed that patients with the HCV core aa substitution at position 75 and CT/TT IL28B genotypes were non-responders (NR), (P=0.023). Moreover, these patients had unmethylated RASSF1A. In contrast, most patients (75%) with aa substitutions at position 91 and CC IL28B genotype achieved sustained virologic response (SVR), (P=0.030), and 70% of them had methylated RASSF1A gene. Our results suggest that combined analysis of aa substitutions in the core protein, the IL28B rs12979860 polymorphism, and the methylation status of the RASSF1A gene may help in predicting treatment response to PEG-IFN/RBV in genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据