3.8 Article

A Generative Design Exploration Methodology for Integration of Structural, Environmental, and User Agencies in an Early Design Stage

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14780771231183176

关键词

Conceptual design; design exploration; TRIZ; genetic algorithm; multi-objective design; Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) plates; informed decision-making; life-cycle assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a generative design exploration methodology that combines a genetic algorithm and the Theory of Innovative Problem Solving to assist designers in problem structuring and decision-making in a multi-disciplinary setting. The methodology allows for investigation of unexpected solutions, application of innovative ideas for resolving contradictory design objectives, and continuous interaction between designers and the search engine. The design case of a mid-rise apartment complex is used to demonstrate the usability and benefits of the developed method.
This article presents a generative design exploration methodology utilized to assist designers in problem structuring and decision-making in a multi-disciplinary setting. This novel design exploration methodology is based on the hybridization of a genetic algorithm (GA) and the Theory of Innovative Problem Solving (TRIZ). This methodology allows investigation of unexpected solutions, application of innovative ideas for resolving contradictory design objectives, and continuous interaction between designers and the search engine. In this study, the design case of a mid-rise apartment complex is used to examine the capacity of the proposed multi-agent design exploration method. Accordingly, both quality and numeric performance-based values of the design alternatives, including the visual appearance of the complex and apartments' shadows over one another, structural and energy efficiency, and life-cycle impact of the building's structural system, are investigated to demonstrate the usability and benefits of the developed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据