3.8 Article

The externality cost of environmental (dis)amenities in the urban housing market: an emerging evidence from Pakistan

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2023.2287190

关键词

(Dis)amenities; property prices; externality; dump sites; Pakistan; systematic random sampling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rising urbanization has a significant impact on the abiotic environmental conditions in housing units, resulting in increased waste production and decreased property values. A study in Pakistan found that the proximity of a waste dump site to residential homes has a significant impact on rental values, with rents decreasing as the distance from the dump site increases. The study recommends stricter enforcement of sanitary laws and regulations to remove irregular waste dump sites from residential areas.
Rising urbanization on abiotic environmental conditions in housing units is one of the most severe difficulties that city municipality authorities face, all over the world. Waste production has increased as a result of households failing to implement waste management strategies that ensure sustainability. Thus, property values in the housing market have regularly deteriorated as a result of environmental (dis)amenities. The study examines the impact of a waste dump site on proximate property values in Pakistan's twin cities. Using a systematic random sampling technique, questionnaires were distributed to 849 households. 35 dump sites were chosen from 100 metres to 500 metres. The dump sites were chosen based on their size and proximity to residential homes in the study area. The empirical results show that the distance between a residential property and a waste dump site significantly impacts rental values. Moreover, rents exhibit a negative relationship with increasing distance from the dump sites. Based on applied findings, more proactive enforcement of sanitary laws and regulations, such as removing all irregular dump sites from residential areas, is recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据