4.7 Article

Phenolic Composition of Red and White Wine Byproducts from Different Grapevine Cultivars from La Rioja (Spain) and How This Is Affected by the Winemaking Process

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 71, 期 48, 页码 18746-18757

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c04660

关键词

functional ingredients; phenolic compounds; UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS; Vitis vinifera; winemaking byproducts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phenolic composition of grape byproducts varies between red and white grape cultivars, as well as between different parts of the grape (skin, seed, and stem). Carbonic maceration has a negative impact on the phenolic content. The specific phenolic composition of these byproducts can be used for various applications.
The recovery of raw materials offers an opportunity for applying the principles of circular bioeconomy. The phenolic composition of three underused wine byproducts (skin, seed, and bunch stem) was analyzed through UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS to evaluate the intercultivar variability comparing red and white grape cultivars from La Rioja (Spain) and the influence of the winemaking, comparing conventional fermentation and carbonic maceration. We observed that the red skin, especially from Graciano, is rich in anthocyanins, whereas the white skin contains mainly phenolic acids, flavonols, and flavan-3-ols, with Maturana Blanca being the richest variety. Seeds are rich in flavan-3-ols and lignans with Maturana Blanca and Viura, respectively, the richest cultivars. Stems contain high amounts of flavan-3-ols, lignans, and stilbenes, with the red cultivars of Garnacha and Tempranillo being the richest samples. Carbonic maceration has a negative effect on the phenolic amount compared to conventional fermentation. In synthesis, we observed that each type of byproduct from red or white grape cultivars has a particular phenolic composition that can result in obtaining different ingredients with particular phenolic composition for target applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据