4.4 Review

Still Arctic?-The changing Barents Sea

期刊

出版社

UNIV CALIFORNIA PRESS
DOI: 10.1525/elementa.2022.00088

关键词

Arctic; Ecosystem; Barents Sea; Sea ice; Climate change; Atlantification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reviews the current state of physical, chemical, and biological systems in the Barents Sea and highlights the significant changes observed in recent decades. The changes have implications for both the environment and human activities in the region. However, there are still gaps in observation and knowledge, particularly during the winter months, which require further research and development.
The Barents Sea is one of the Polar regions where current climate and ecosystem change is most pronounced. Here we review the current state of knowledge of the physical, chemical and biological systems in the Barents Sea. Physical conditions in this area are characterized by large seasonal contrasts between partial sea-ice cover in winter and spring versus predominantly open water in summer and autumn. Observations over recent decades show that surface air and ocean temperatures have increased, sea-ice extent has decreased, ocean stratification has weakened, and water chemistry and ecosystem components have changed, the latter in a direction often described as Atlantification or borealisation, with a less Arctic appearance. Temporal and spatial changes in the Barents Sea have a wider relevance, both in the context of large-scale climatic (air, water mass and sea-ice) transport processes and in comparison to other Arctic regions. These observed changes also have socioeconomic consequences, including for fisheries and other human activities. While several of the ongoing changes are monitored and quantified, observation and knowledge gaps remain, especially for winter months when field observations and sample collections are still sparse. Knowledge of the interplay of physical and biogeochemical drivers and ecosystem responses, including complex feedback processes, needs further development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据