4.3 Article

Graphical abstracts' pedagogical implications: Skills & challenges in visual remediation

期刊

ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 141-155

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2023.10.006

关键词

Visual remediation; Graphical abstract; Multimodal literacy; Skills and challenges; Curriculum design

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the rhetorical functions, image and text relations, as well as the skills and challenges involved in intentionally embedding graphical abstract (GA) composition in an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course, based on student composition and critical reflections on GAs, as well as qualitative and quantitative data collection from a survey and interview involving professors, young researchers (YRs) and students. The study also discusses the pedagogical implications that arise from this exploration.
As scholarly communication becomes more multimodal in nature, research articles embrace semiotic resources in appended genres such as the graphical abstract (GA). As an established genre in Chemistry research articles, GAs visually remediate chemical processes or research niche. However, this genre still remains in a peripheral area of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) courses as ESP practitioners mainly focus on textual modes. With limited opportunities to compose GAs, students foster genre remediation skills that are limited to textual genres only, ignoring the potential of reading-to-design skills. Upon student composition and critical reflections on GAs, as well as qualitative and quantitative data collection from a survey and interview involving professors, young researchers (YRs) and students, this paper examines rhetorical functions as well as image and text relations, while throwing some light on skills and challenges involved when GA composition is intentionally embedded in an ESP course, and discusses ensuing pedagogical implications. O 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据